Thursday, January 20, 2011

Imiges Of The Preceding Mucas Of Cat Labor

Review: Life Beyond

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi6_o_c24wq7eJqOdDqSiy6wCMDBS_39I3w3p-QENSQ4x4TrwpLXtf3AHOT-1tQkXtap4cRN90CJXNeHgBY8WK4JtO-R_szjhzlysDx-459GTQR2kPJE3T4oznd-2O_M2CMnSuy0R5agSxm/s1600/4.png

The art of storytelling as an

A story about craft. One way to tell stories in a calm, quiet non-speed events but are insignificant. The small art of cinematic storytelling.

This broadly is what characterizes master the latest Clint Eastwood movie, and this is what first gives us with his latest film "Beyond Life", which will disappoint a few of the followers of this particular filmmaker.

Three stories, with no apparent common thread but the main issue is none other than death. The dark lady lurks and that in this case raises thoughts about the afterlife without complexes, without a deep scientific analysis but attempt to give a strong moral character that goes beyond (pun intended) of a simple reading frivolous causing a slight feeling of interest even in the most skeptical mind these matters so little known. Nothing radically subjective dogmas, but a slight philosophical reading of an event not to be routine we still too enigmatic. It is no coincidence that the octogenarian director views this and other dilemmas the heights of his life, but it is amazing the clarity of approach, the radical departure from a position light or superficial.

The first story takes us to see as a successful professional life and sentimental by the French hostess Marie (Cécile de France), we can move to deeper isolation and homelessness because of approaching death through a natural disaster. The second story takes us to see the sadness and the disbelief of a child facing death of his twin brother, and a drug-addicted mother. Finally, Eastwood's character shows us that a priori might be the epicenter of history, through a medium (Matt Damon) apparently without guile and he is able to see beyond life.

Eastwood elaborates this trio of stories in an absolutely independent, but with the peculiarity linked somehow to keep the viewer's retina to enrich each and to some extent combined feeding and indirectly between them. One senses that these parallel stories, though geographically far intertwined somehow merge to achieve a final redemptive ecstasy as promising solutions to the dilemmas. Not until the final when they can see if there is such a merger, but in the meantime every one of the three stories contain both individual interest, which by themselves keep the film in a narrative and emotional high. In this sense it is impossible not to remember the trilogy González Iñárritu (Amores perros, 21 Grams, Babel) film by Rodrigo Garcia (Things You Can Tell Just by looking, Nine Lives, Mothers and daughters) or the excellent Paul Haggis Crash to get an idea of \u200b\u200ba cinema that effectively goes into the particular and always controversial personal stigma of the human soul.

The film also adheres to the contemporary moment of globalization and is framed in three completely different geographical settings and in two languages \u200b\u200b(English and French) while Peter Morgan's script uses relatively recent historical events and social impact the Southeast Asian tsunami or the London bombings, to add currency, currency, and a purely contemporary allows for strictly personal view events.

The music comes from the same accurate Eastwood and photography, Tom Stern of his faithful, he adds that dense, dark halo many times necessary to achieve a climax of mystery and intrigue that accompany more than a few moments of the film. A film that also contains murmurs dear, intimate approach a certain level of emotional and above all a narrative structure that moves so well developed and maintains the interest equally intense throughout the film.

Eastwood returns to find the appropriate key. Again to deepen the friendly and sensitive side of human beings, and gives us an interesting, thoughtful, and at times sublime.


sergio_roma00@yahoo.es

Temazapam Use In Dogs

Review: Road to Freedom

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5DjAYPiA_vVDi0RGsL2VLOOlVSaETyAHz2AB0aWcrebOOU3Ocyoh7BH7v5Wa1occQx_S83B_BxmbQ0vZZuWGokc0MaKUvd9cSxoi0Tp2vJeXgKK7zWhWw178Az836XEQUIRcOR-lr2xb-/s1600/3.png

The triumph of the epic

What director Peter Weir is a brave and a very personal film, corroborating previous films as "Witness," "The Dead Poets Society" or "The Truman Show ". So it is not unusual to find a project of such magnitude involved in a dignified aura of humility accompanied by a small and unobtrusive commercial promotion.

Peter Weir faces in this film a chapter of history little known but no less interesting, as is the existence of the Gulag in Stalin's Russia. Escape from a Siberian prison, and all the way to find freedom will be the road to be both protagonists and spectators go in this epic drama based on real events.

Most notable of "Road to Freedom" is without doubt the tremendous work of both actors and director who is seen in the many aspects that the film gives us. The variety of languages \u200b\u200b(all perfectly consistent with the story), adaptations to climate, dangerous situations, etc, etc. allow us to verify that after the camera has been a commitment that goes beyond the purely commercial film, and professionalism For something more than mere applause interpretation. Both Ed Harris in a role perfectly designed for him, as the amazing Colin Farrell in one of the best work of his career, as the little-known Saoirse Ronan, and especially the great Jim Sturgess make a computer that fits perfectly in a limitless adventure where the complicity of every one of them can give or not to tear up the future of the film. The talks, looks, silence ... all forms an indispensable personal world that allows the story (perhaps too long) runs through a linear narrative and commendable that accepts the deal with the spectator in the universal language of entertainment . Because

Weir's film is very entertaining. And practically no longer be at any time. But having said that, one is left with the impression the missed opportunity. With existing molds, and more narrative approach and argument, we could be talking about the movie of the year for various reasons. Instead, "Road to Freedom" is just another good movie in which so much effort to some extent by the team remains in suspense to a story that fails to thrill, that despite the good complicity actors, is not convinced in the personal sense of their relationships, and ultimately lost in ways too epic adventure to end overlapping the emotional intensity, leaving a bitter dregs from seeing the broad spectrum in principle had created.

The superb performance by Jim Sturgess, which convince us with "50 men killed", allows us to confirm a rising star within the contemporary cinema, and the strength of feeling and good command of the direction of master Weir, allows us to enjoy recommended film, and expect in the future a new and surprising project.

is not, as it may seem, Weir's great film, but is instead an interesting option to further approach a little-known chapter of World War II, enjoy spectacular scenery, and admire the great interpretative moments caliber.


sergio_roma00@yahoo.es